Image pending

Case study

Giving 84 exhibitors numbers they would renew for

A trade exhibition organiser was losing sponsor renewals because exhibitors could not evidence return. We instrumented the floor and gave every stand its own scan data within 24 hours of close.

84Exhibitor stands instrumented
24hrTo per-stand reporting
38%Uplift in renewal conversations

The challenge

What was actually wrong

Exhibitors were told footfall was strong but had nothing to take to their own finance teams. Renewal conversations were happening on anecdote, and three anchor exhibitors had already declined to rebook.

Approach

How we sized it

The problem was reporting, not footfall. We gave each stand a scanner and a portal, and — more importantly — agreed with the organiser what a 'lead' meant before the show, so the number meant the same thing to every exhibitor. Ambiguous definitions are what make this data unusable.

Deployment

What went on the floor

Badge scanning at 84 stands, dwell-time sampling at aisle level, and a per-exhibitor portal live during the show rather than after it. Final per-stand packs went out within 24 hours of close, while the show was still fresh in a finance director's mind.

Results

What we measured

84

Exhibitor stands instrumented

24hr

To per-stand reporting

38%

Uplift in renewal conversations

Let's build the room

Send us the date, the city and the headcount. We come back with sizing, staffing and a costed range.